Tag: tonal center

  • Mapping Music 8. TONALITY

    In traditional tonal music, or for a composer’s personal design, there are four main factors defining a tonal language: source scale (covered in Mapping Music 5); harmonic type; horizontal (voicing) connection; and tonal center, a basic concept for Common-Practice tonal music.

    A diatonic major or minor scale and harmonic structures built from it define a key and “tonic” home-base tonal center. (In the ancient modal music of the monophonic Gregorian chant it was called the “finalis,” as it was the expected final arrival destination of an extended melody.) Triads taken from the scale build a scaffold of harmonies, featuring the dominant chord (scale degrees 5, 7, 2, and sometimes 4) with its scale-degree 7 “leading tone” propelling a progression to resolve back to the tonic chord (scale degrees 1, 3, 5).

    In 20th-century music, some composers (notably Bartók) began to define tonal center contextually rather than by scale-and-key, writing melodic patterns and counterpoint that branched out from and converged back to a core base (but not necessarily bass) pitch. Twelve-tone music, derived from the full chromatic scale, would seem to be avoiding any tonal center, but some composers still built textures whose lines and counterpoint would emphasize one focal pitch-class.

    A matrix of choices

    In forging a tonal language, the composer develops preferences in each of these factors. Choices from each factor column can be mixed in a variety of ways. The composer designs by delving into more specific patterns, especially for the source scale (possibly, say, a six-note pitch-class set) and the harmonic type, establishing a preference for certain harmonic intervals (such as my favoritism for 7-semitone Perfect 5ths and 11-semitone Major 7ths).

    There are, of course, thousands if not millions of possible combinations of all these factors, a universe of tonal possibilities for the individual composer and a particular piece.

    Next, let’s dive more deeply into harmonic types and the factor of horizontal connections between successive harmonies.

    Constellation streams

    A stream of successive constellations, which we might nickname a “constream,” would traditionally be called a chord progression. In the following example, all stacks are 10 semitones tall; no common tones in the transposition choices.

    no common-tone connections

    In the next example, stacks of differing heights, with constellations that reduce to three different scale patterns: scale array 5 2, then 2 3, back to 5 2, then 4 1, and finally 2 5, inversion of 5 2.

    common-tone connection

    Now a longer, more mixed succession of interval stacks of constellations belonging to these same three scale patterns (2 5 or 5 2; 1 4 or 4 1; and 2 3).

    extended constreams

    Back to my constellation friends of Mapping Music 6, we can make some constreams with them.

    diatonic and chromatic successions of symmetrical constellations

    An intriguing example from the literature of great early modern music, an interlude near the beginning of Stravinsky’s L’Histoire du Soldat:

    L’Histoire du Soldat excerpt

    This passage is intriguing in many ways. It looks like counterpoint between two woodwind instruments in high register. But both lines are quite simple and don’t seem to go anywhere. (In our GALAXIES: Structure chapter, we’ll discuss these questions of texture and counterpoint.) Introducing it here raises the question of harmony, of constellations and their arrays, though the passage doesn’t look at all chordal. Here is an array analysis of the constellations formed in the first through fourth bars then jumping to bar 10 and, finally, bar 14.

    L’Histoire du Soldat constellations

    Now you can see and hear more clearly the role played by array interval of 7 semitones (“Perfect 5th” as in above examples) and also 5, and 2 semitones in the harmonic continuity of the passage. (Also note 7 + 7 = 14; 5 + 2 = 7; 5 +5 = 10; 2 + 12 = 14; etc.)

    To illustrate that this is not all just theoretical, here is a simple etude composed using exactly the constellations and successions explored in Examples 12 and 17. It took only about an hour to compose this minute and a half in Sibelius. The title: the constellation Pleiades (“Seven Sisters”) is a tight cluster of 7 stars tagging along in the winter sky with Taurus as the Zodiac sails westward every night.

    12-tone sets

    Let’s keep going. How about designing a succession of three four-pitch constellations, so that all 12 pitch classes of the chromatic scale are included but none repeated? (Traditional terminology calls such a set a 12-tone aggregate.)

    three sets make a row

    Constellations a) and c) are different “chord voicing” of the same scale pattern, 2 4 2 . Both scale patterns and all three interval stacks are symmetrical. And they all contain two 6-semitone “tritones,” giving the whole succession the tritone’s quality of ambiguity and the character of the succession a feeling of mystery.

    Altering arrays

    Similarity of interval patterns can build coherence in a stream of constellations. Beyond functional common-practice harmony, this is a kind of process that composers of the 20th century and today can use to create a “new tonality”.

    Possible operations to transform an interval array into a closely related array:

    OPEN — Expand an interval by an octave, adding 12 semitones

    FUSE — Join two adjacent intervals to make a larger interval, the sum of their sizes

    DELETE — Remove an interval, shortening the stack’s height

    SUBDIVIDE — Insert a pitch to divide an interval into two smaller intervals, whose sum equals the original interval

    PROPOGATE — Append or insert an interval of a size already present into the stack

    INVERT — Reverse the registrar order of the stack — turn it upside down

    alteration examples

    There are operations that more significantly alter the character of the interval array.

    REDISTRIBUTE — Fuse two adjacent intervals into one larger interval then re-subdivide it into two different smaller intervals

    SHRINK / STRETCH — Alter one interval size by other than an octave, leaving others unchanged

    COMPRESS / EXPAND — Alter all intervals in the stack by adding or subtracting each by the same number of semitones, or multiplying each by a constant

    These alterations are listed in order, from the mildest alteration producing a similar array (redistribution) to the most dramatic producing a substantially different array, compression or expansion of the whole array (preserving little from the original but its symmetry). Here is an example employing these altering transformations.

    more alterations, with common-tone connections

    The other element of coherence in this example is the many common-tone connections between one chord and the next, establishing a slow-moving stability. Another example of the same interval stacks, same succession of alterations, but choosing transpositional level of each constellation to create as many 1-semitone voicing connections as possible (10 such voicing connections in the following example) makes the con stream’s sense of progressive change stronger.

    more alterations, with semitone connections

    Finally, another example etude, using this last constream . . .

    © 2026 – All Rights Reserved

    Thomas S. Clark

    Continue reading Mapping the Music Universe:

    TClarkArtMusic.com 

  • Mapping Music 4. TUNING

    “To understand the Universe,

    you must understand the language in which it’s written,

    the language of Mathematics.”

    — Stephen Hawking

    Galileo revolutionized astronomy, in part by using a new tool: the telescope.

    Schoenberg revolutionized harmony by evolving an existing concept, the chromatic scale, into a new tool: the 12-tone scale, and devised a new compositional tool of the 12-tone row.

    Allen Forte took Schoenberg’s ideas to another level of abstraction: defining Pitch Class and applying basic math to the 12-tone universe.

    Chrisman focused on the interval essence of pitch patterns: defining the “successive interval array.”

    I am merely another explorer using their maps but choosing my own creative path. In doing so, I will define some of my own terms, while adapting and clarifying some established terms that fit what I’m thinking and expressing.

    From Tuning to Tonality

    We think of traditional common-practice Tonality of the 17th through 19th centuries being synonymous with the major and minor scales. But there’s more to traditional common-practice Tonality than just the scale. Here are the four basic factors that determine any tonal design:

    SOURCE SCALEHARMONIC TYPETONAL CENTER
    ancient modeperfect intervalsfixed by mode
    Major / minortriadmodulatory shifting
    extended chromaticextended triadpolytonal centers
    exotic / syntheticnon-triadestablished contextually
    12-tonediversenone

    tonal design factors

    As you can see, there is much to explore: scales, modes, intervals, consonance . . .

    Tuning

    Taking the overtone series and partial vibrations as a natural acoustical model, Pythagoras identified pitch intervals as simple integer ratios of lengths of a vibrating string. The same ratios describe frequency ratios.

    fundamental pitch C and overtones

    For example, what we call a Perfect Fifth, the interval of the Third Partial to the Second Partial of a natural overtone series, is a 3:2 ratio. Such natural tuning is always employed by orchestras, bands, and a cappella choirs.

    • Octave = 2:1
    • Perfect 5th = 3:2
    • Perfect 4th = 4:3
    • Major 3rd = 5:4
    • Minor 3rd = 6:5
    • Major 6th = 5:3
    • Minor 6th = 8:5
    • Major 2nd = 9:8

    This approach requires, however, that intonation be constantly adjusted as the key changes or tonal context shifts. For a keyboard that can’t make those adjustments, the fixed tuning devised in the 18th century, called Equal Temperament, compromises the Perfect Fifth, shrinking it from a 1.5 ratio to 1.498307 so that it and all other intervals are very slightly but equally mis-tuned in every possible key or tonal context. The ratio for a semitone is derived mathematically from the 12th root of 2: 1.059643094. That ratio, multiplied by itself 12 times, results in 2.000, the ratio of the octave.

    comparing tuning systems

    While “chromatic” historically meant extending a key with accidentals — temporary extra sharps or flats — now we refer to the 12-half-step scale as the chromatic scale. Two pitch names for the same piano key — C-sharp or D-flat — are said to be enharmonic and considered equivalent, almost interchangeable.

    Equal Temperament became the basis for the 20th-century system of 12 equal semitones per octave, the basis not only for all keyboard instruments but also for harmonic theory in the post-tonal world of 12-tone music. We should not forget, however, that choirs, orchestras and bands still use the purer natural tuning, even with music that has no key signature.

    Other tuning systems

    Long before equal temperament, the Chinese culture developed several systems. A fascinating history is described in Gene Jinsiong Cho’s monograph, LU-LU: A study of Its Historical, Acoustical and Symbolic Signification (Caves Books, Ltd., Taipei, 1989). Cho (a music theory professor colleague at the University of North Texas) explains the LU system from the Chin Dynasty, which extended beyond 12 increments in an octave as far as to the arcane realm of Jing fang’s sixty LU series.

    In the West and into the 20th century, two American composers experimented with microtonal tunings splitting the octave into finer increments than our 12 semitones.

    Working with American Lou Harrison, California composer Harry Partch (1901-1974) devised his own tuning system with 43 increments, described in Genesis of a Music (1947). The system necessitated invention of specialized percussion and string instruments to precisely intone the sounds, which felt exotic both in tuning and sound quality.

    Harry Partch – Castor & Pollux (1952)

    University of Illinois professor Ben Johnston (1926-2019) wrote music for standard orchestral string instruments using the ancient just intonations of Pythagorus. This involved specifying pitches microtonally slightly higher or lower than the equal-tempered standard pitch classes – a notational challenge of pitch-adjustment symbols.  

    Ben Johnston – String Quartet No. 7 (1984)

    In the 21st century, Japanese composer norokusi has produced a broad catalog of microtonal music, apparently using a 17-increment division of the octave.

    norokusi – Piano Sonata n.718 (2018) 17EDO/TET

    Such complex systems as described above never became mainstream. The vast bulk of 20th-century and now 21st-century music is based on the equal-tempered 12-increment system found on a well-tuned piano, with subtle adjustments by orchestral strings, wind bands and a cappella choirs to momentarily purify some sonorities.

    © 2026 – All Rights Reserved

    Thomas S. Clark

    Continue reading Mapping the Music Universe:

    TClarkArtMusic.com